Return to Home Page


 

 

What Religious Liberty?
The Incredible Ever-Expanding Dead End
Anti-Cure, Anti-Life
Whose Values in Education?
Toppling Dominos
Anti-Christians don't have to be Hypocrites but Many Volunteer
Intolerant Tolerance
The Emperor's Clothes or a Cheap Tuxedo
The Myth of Hitler's Pope, Part I
The Myth of Hitler's Pope, Part II
Embryonic Stem Cell Research Again
The Madness of Secularism
"Don't Impose Your Religion on Me"
Dictatorship of Relativism
Two Babies at Christmas

Living Will or Death Warrant?
Court Ordered Slow Motion Torture-Death Sentence
Men in Black
A Lot of Hot Air
The Culture War Battles
"Stay with us, Lord"
Secular-to-English Dictionary
Moral Guidance for Catholics in this Election
Christians Losing America
Stem Cell Wars
Catholic Pro-Abortion Politicians and Communion
Useful Idiots
Who Killed Jesus?
A Primer on Gay Marriage
Whose Side are You on?
Vouchers Revisited
Real and Fake Cloning Bans
Broken Compasses

No Room in the Inn
Killing Fields Revisited
Gay but not Merry
Adam and Steve?
The Battle for the Court
Victimless Crimes

More Salt, Please

The Next Big Fight

When Religion Becomes Evil
Virginity Making a Comeback?

You've Come a Long Way, Baby
The Incarnational Approach
The Many Meanings of ACLU
Things Your Media Never Told You
A Nasty Little Secret
Two Points of View on the Birth of Jesus
You Gotta Kill Them.  How Else Are They Going To Learn?
Perplexing Christmas Questions
How Do You See Christ Today?
Now that there is Another Ewe, will there be Another You?
What is Conscience Anyhow?
Divorce of Love and Life
What Counts as a Mass?
What is a Covenant?
I Wish I had Your Faith
Are there Too Many Decrees of Nullity?
Dutch Treats
Ecumenism
Going from Baby Doe to Granny Doe
Comments of Evangelium Vitae
The Exception Corrupts the Rule

Good Morality or Good Medicine
Generation-X'ers Smart in Every Way But One
A Matter of Good Breeding
Herod and Pontius Pilate at the Polls
Hitler's Pope or Righteous Gentile?

The Unknown God
What exactly is wrong with homosexuality?
Ideology Trumps Science, Reality, and Common Sense
What Exactly is an Indulgence?
Infallibility and Error in the Church
Pilate Asked, "What is Truth?"
The Truth about Families
New Killing Fields
Choice of Language and Language of Choice
A Lexicon for Our Day
Why are there so many bodies?
Marijuana, Medicine or Menace?
Medical Research and Ethics
Meditation

"You Taught me well, Mommie dearest"
Moral Fallout
Neutral on the Wrong Side
"These are the Nineties After All"
Many are Wed but Few are Married
"...Prepare him for additional obligations"
A Useful Lie
A Partridge in a Pear Tree
Religious Persecution in the U.S.?
What Makes a Person a Person?
The Point of a Point of View
Politically Correct, Morally Depraved
Population Controllers out of Control
Practical Dreamers
Social Progress through Immorality
Shall we Do Evil for Goodness Sake?
Reason and Faith
Resurrection Glory
Same Sex Marriages?
Pearl of Great Price
"I used to be schizophrenic, but we're all right now"
Sexual Morality Irrelevant in Judging Public Officials?
Undesirable Side Effects
Some News is Good News
SOSSLQ's, not POSSLQ's
Spoils of Splits
Why Attend Mass Every Sunday?
Is it All Right to Pull the Plug?
An Appeal for Intolerance
Topics Catechetical
A Voting Catechism
A Moral Guide to Voting
Vouchers: Has Their Time Come?
What Child is This?
What did they die of?
You are the Man
You may be a liberal if...
Get Rid of that Worthless Relative
Planned Un-Parenthood
Weighing Pro-Life Issues Prior to Voting

 

 







 



 














 

 

 
Monsignor Brunner Photo  
by Monsignor James C. Brunner
From the Pastor's Desk

Faith Points
  


You’ve Come a Long Way, Baby

There was a time when the Church was involved in burning heretics. That is a long way from the Holy Father’s seeking an end to capital punishment.

Catholics in support of capital punishment are about 70%. The support drops to 44% when there is an option of life imprisonment without parole. It is useful to see justifications of the practice and the assault made on it in our day.

Some Catholics think capital punishment is based on scripture. There are two basic texts cited.

          If anyone sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed; for in the        image of God has man been made. (Gen. 9:6)

 The problem with using this text as validation of capital punishment is that it does not appear to be a precept, but a proverb in the same sense as “he who lives by the sword will perish by the sword” or “what a man sows that he shall reap.” The main emphasis is that man has been made to the image and likeness of God and that applies to the criminal who is sentenced to capital punishment. If this were a legal prescription why would Cain not have been slain?

“(F)or it [the state] is a servant of God for your good. But if you do evil, be afraid, for it does not bear the sword without purpose; it is the servant of God to inflict wrath on the evildoer. (Rom. 13:4)

This is not a justification of capital punishment or that the state should engage in bloodshed. It is a symbolic way of expressing the legitimacy of the state’s penal authority with no hint on how it is to be carried out.

Proponents of capital punishment say that it is necessary as a deterrent for others. Studies done in this area are very inconclusive. If it is a deterrent it is a very feeble one. Persons who commit homicide do so under misguided passion or under the influence of alcohol or drugs with scant thought for legal consequences. Former California governor Pat Brown noted that southern states, all zealously applying the death penalty, have the highest homicide rate. In an 1875 study of murder and capital punishment a prison chaplain declared that he had accompanied 167 prisoners to the gallows, 161 of whom had been present at earlier hangings. If the deterrent benefit is not absolutely operative morality and common sense would seem to indicate that the certainty of the right to life of the offender should prevail.

Defenders of the death penalty present it as a cost-effective alternative to life imprisonment. Actually life imprisonment may be cheaper. Estimates for the cost of trials for homicide range from $1.8 and $2.2 million. The latter amount would pay for 55 years of incarceration at the rate of $40,000 per year.

Capital punishment defenders say that it is a matter or retribution. In this case retribution sounds like revenge, a wholly inappropriate reaction in a Christian. Here is a sampling of texts:

            Matt. 5:44-48 and Luke 6:27-28 (Love your enemies, pray for persecutors)

            Matt. 5:7 and James 2:13 (The merciful will be shown mercy)

            Matt. 6:11 (We ask to be forgiven as we forgive)

            Matt. 6:14-15, Mk. 11:25 and Luke 6:37 (If you do not forgive you will not  be forgiven)

            Matt. 5:3, 38 (Offer no resistance to evil)

            Matt. 18:21-22 (Forgive not seven times, but seventy-seven times)

            Leviticus 19:18 and Rom. 12:19 (Take no revenge, vengeance belongs to God)

          Additionally we have two examples of forgiveness: by Jesus—Luke 23:24         (“Father, forgive them”) and Stephen—Acts 7:60.

In applying the teaching of the bible to capital punishment we must not be guided by questionable interpretations of two texts while we ignore the whole thrust of the New Testament toward mercy and against revenge. Justice is not wrought by revenge that is legally sanctioned.

The philosopher Immanuel Kant argued in favor the death penalty because the moral order has been upset by a serious crime. That is like arguing that the order of mathematics is unhinged if anyone makes a mistake in calculation.

There are many things against capital punishment. It has failed to meet its stated objectives. It is applied inconsistently and mostly against the poor who cannot afford top-notch lawyers. Many innocent persons have been executed. In its glory days it was applied to those who worshiped God in the wrong way and against innocent women denounced as witches.

The death penalty is an affront to the image and the likeness of God. A diamond remains a diamond even if it is covered with slime. A human is still the image and the likeness of God in spite of his slimy behavior because God make him his image and no one can remove that. If we do violence to the image and likeness of God it is tantamount to disrespect for God himself.

One can use lethal force if this is necessary to preserve one’s own life from an attacker. However, no force may be used which goes beyond protecting one’s life. Thus it would not be permissible to kill an assailant who could be stopped by merely wounding him. More force than necessary partakes of revenge rather than legitimate defense of one’s own life.

Similarly a state may use lethal force to protect itself as in the case of a just war against an unjust aggressor. It may also use capital punishment against criminals who threaten the existence of the state if that is the only way to stop the threat. In modern society it is difficult to imagine how a captured, incarcerated criminal can be a threat to the existence of the state. The same rule of using only that amount of force necessary to protect the state applies as governs individuals under attack. For that reason in modern society there appears to be no justifiable reason for capital punishment. Anything that goes beyond incarceration smacks of revenge. 

Some think that the legitimacy of capital punishment is a virtual dogma that cannot be changed. The Pontifical Commission for Justice and Peace asserts, “The Church has never directly addressed the question of the State’s right to exercise the death penalty.” Pope John XXIII wrote, “It is not that the Gospel has changed; it is that we have begun to understand it better.” The death penalty does not square with the gospel of Jesus. The Church should not have accepted uncritically the legal practices of ancient Rome. Christians can scarcely be proud of a culture that features both soaring shrines in which to adore God and ghastly gallows in which to inflict indignities on God’s image and likeness. It took many centuries to recognize the immorality of slavery because it was an insult to human dignity. Now is the time to remove the insult to human dignity that is capital punishment. The Church has come a long way but its members still have a long way to go.

(Printed January, 2003)

 St. Mary's Church Pastor & Vicar

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Home  |  Pastor & Parochial Vicar  |  St. Mary's Staff  |  Schedule &  Ministry Info  
St. Mary's History  |  From the Pastor's Desk  |  Map & Directions  |  St. Mary's Photos  Diocese of Victoria  |  Links of Interest   |  Daily Readings

 GNWDA Button Copyright© 1997 - 2005
St. Mary's Church
All Rights Reserved